Henry v. Phixios Holdings, Inc.
Delaware Court of Chancery
2017 WL 2928034 (2017)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Phixios Holdings, Inc. (defendant) adopted a stock-transfer restriction in a stockholder agreement, permitting a majority of stockholders to revoke a stockholder’s stock if they found that the stockholder acted in ways damaging to the corporation. Jon Henry (plaintiff) was a Phixios stockholder. The above restriction was not noted on his stock certificate, and Henry did not have knowledge of the restriction before he bought the stock. Henry later became aware of the restriction but never agreed to be bound by it. In response to allegations that Henry tried to compete with Phixios, the company rescinded his stock in accordance with the stock-transfer restriction. Henry sought access to company books and records. Phixios denied him access, claiming that he was no longer a stockholder. Henry sued the company, seeking a declaration that the restriction did not apply to him and that he was a still a stockholder.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Montgomery-Reeves, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
