From our private database of 36,900+ case briefs...
Henslee v. Singleton
United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
2018 WL 1252120 (2018)
Jonathan Leigh Henslee (plaintiff), a prisoner, was sprayed in the face with pepper spray by Marty Singleton (defendant), a prison guard. Henslee brought a civil suit, alleging that Singleton used excessive force against him. At the trial, the district-court judge admitted evidence of Henslee’s prior felony convictions under Federal Rule of Evidence 609(a)(1). The judge instructed the jury that Henslee’s prior felony convictions were to be considered only for the purpose of assessing Henslee’s credibility. Subsequently, the jury ruled in favor of Singleton. Henslee appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 629,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 36,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.