Hepp v. Facebook
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
14 F.4th 204 (2021)
- Written by Angela Patrick, JD
Facts
Karen Hepp (plaintiff) was the host of a television news program. Hepp spent money and years of effort developing a positive public image, and her endorsement of a product or service had commercial value. Someone took an unauthorized photo of Hepp while she was in a convenience store. The photo appeared in advertisements on a website operated by Facebook (defendant) and in other internet locations, including advertisements for an online dating application, erectile-dysfunction treatments, and pornography. Hepp sued Facebook and other website operators (collectively, site operators) (defendants) in federal district court, alleging that they had violated her right to publicity under Pennsylvania state law by publishing the unauthorized photo in the advertisements. The site operators moved to dismiss the lawsuit on grounds that they were immune from the right-to-publicity claims under § 230(c) of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (CDA). The district court granted the motion to dismiss. Hepp appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Hardiman, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 914,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,300 briefs, keyed to 999 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

