Herrin v. Sutherland
Montana Supreme Court
241 P. 328 (1925)
- Written by Michael Beverly, JD
Facts
Sutherland (defendant) hunted ducks and migratory game birds. On one occasion Sutherland repeatedly used his shotgun to shoot birds that were flying over Herrin’s land. Herrin sued Sutherland for damages for trespass. Sutherland unsuccessfully demurred to the complaint and thereafter failed to answer the complaint. Accordingly, default judgment was entered in favor of Herrin. Upon Herrin’s recommendation, the court awarded Herrin only nominal damages. Sutherland appealed to the Supreme Court of Montana.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Callaway, C.J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 778,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.