Hilmor Sales Co. v. Helen Neushaefer Div. of Supronics Corp.
New York Supreme Court
6 UCC Rep. Serv. 325 (1969)
- Written by Tom Syverson, JD
Facts
Hilmor Sales Co. (Hilmor) (plaintiff) contracted with Helen Neushaefer Div. of Supronics Corp. (Neushaefer) (defendant) for the sale of lipstick and nail polish. Neushaefer was selling the lipstick and nail polish at bargain prices. Neushaefer failed to deliver the lipstick and nail polish, and Hilmor sued Neushaefer. As a remedy, instead of money damages, Hilmor sought specific performance of the contract. This means Hilmor asked the court to force Neushaefer to deliver the requested lipstick and nail polish at the bargain price. Hilmor argued that specific performance was necessary because the contract price was so low, and no other seller offered the bargain price. Because Hilmor could not find lipstick and nail polish at a comparable price, Hilmor claimed that specific performance was necessary.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Satz, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.