Hilton Hotels Corp. v. ITT Corp.
United States District Court for the District of Nevada
978 F.Supp. 1342 (D. Nev. 1997)
Hilton Hotels Corp. (Hilton) (plaintiff) announced a tender offer for ITT Corp. (ITT) (defendant) stock at $55 per share. Hilton also announced that it would be initiating a proxy contest at ITT’s next annual meeting. ITT rejected Hilton’s tender offer and constructed a defensive plan to split ITT into three distinct entities. The plan restructured the ITT board of directors, keeping the same directors, but staggering the board into three classes with each class comprised of three directors, and one class elected each year. ITT sought to implement the plan before its next annual meeting and without shareholder approval. Hilton brought suit, seeking an injunction enjoining ITT from adopting the plan and a declaration that ITT may not implement the plan without a shareholder vote.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Pro, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 160,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,700 briefs, keyed to 186 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.