Hinish v. Meier & Frank Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
166 Or. 482, 113 P.2d 438 (1941)
- Written by Sarah Hoffman, JD
Facts
George Hinish (plaintiff) was a civil-service employee. Civil-service employees were prohibited by law from participating in political activities. Meier & Frank Company, Inc. (Meier) (defendant) was a general merchant that had an optical department. A proposed state law would have made it illegal to continue selling eyeglasses out of the Meier store. Meier sent a petition to the governor in opposition to the bill. Hinish’s name was included on the petition although he had not signed it. Signing the petition would have been considered political activity, and having his name on the petition endangered Hinish’s job. Hinish filed suit against Meier for breach of privacy. The trial court found in favor of Meier, and Hinish appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Lusk, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.