Hinson v. Jefferson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
215 S.E.2d 102 (1975)

- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Defendants sold a parcel of land to the plaintiff and conveyed it by a deed that restricted it to residential use. There was no town sewage system, so the plaintiffs had to install a septic system. Upon inspection by county and federal health officials, it was determined that the land was subject to flooding and not high enough to allow for a septic system. Neither the plaintiff nor the defendants knew about this when the sale was completed. There was no express warranty in the deed. The plaintiff brought suit on a theory of implied warranty. The trial court found in favor of the defendants and the court of appeals reversed. The defendants appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Copeland, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 964,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,006 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,006 law school casebooks.

