From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
Hitzelberger v. Samedan Oil Corp.
Texas Court of Appeals
948 S.W.2d 497 (Tex. App. 1997)
Samedan Oil Corporation (Samedan) (defendant) was the lessee of an oil and gas lease to which Robert Hitzelberger (plaintiff) was the lessor. The habendum clause of the lease stated that, subject to other provisions in the lease, the lease would be for a primary term of three years and as long thereafter as minerals were produced and royalties were paid. The royalty clause of the lease provided that Hitzelberger was owed a royalty within 120 days of a producing well being drilled on the leasehold or within a unit with which the leasehold was pooled, and monthly royalty payments thereafter. The royalty clause also provided that a failure to pay either the initial or monthly royalty payments would terminate the lease. Hitzelberger agreed to allow Samedan to pool the leasehold in exchange for a commitment that his royalties would survive the pooling agreement. During the primary term of the lease, Samedan drilled a producing well within the pooled unit, but not on the Hitzelberger leasehold. Samedan paid an initial royalty to Hitzelberger 120 days after the well was drilled, but failed to make any monthly royalty payments thereafter during the primary term. Hitzelberger brought suit for a declaration that the lease was terminated due to Samedan’s nonpayment. Samedan claimed that only a habendum clause in a lease could determine the lease’s duration, and that the habendum clause in Samedan’s lease only explicitly required royalty payments during the secondary term of the lease. The trial court found in favor of Samedan. Hitzelberger appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Davis, C.J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.