Hoffman v. Bob Law, Inc.

888 N.W.2d 569 (2016)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hoffman v. Bob Law, Inc.

South Dakota Supreme Court
888 N.W.2d 569 (2016)

Play video

Facts

Bob Law (defendant) owned Bob Law, Inc. (defendant) (collectively, Law), which in turn owned a residential addition. Law entered an agreement with Rick DeJager to jointly develop the addition. During this process, an error was made in the marking of the boundary between Lot 3 and Lot 4. Law conveyed Lot 3 to DeJager, who made improvements, including the installation of a concrete retaining wall and concrete pad, parts or all of which were located in Lot 4 due to the earlier error. DeJager then defaulted on his mortgage, causing the bank to acquire Lot 3. Kenneth Hoffman (plaintiff) agreed to purchase Lot 3 from the bank. Eager to close, Hoffman opted not to have the property surveyed. The deal was closed. The next day, Law informed Hoffman of an encroachment into Lot 4 and sought to dig up the septic system. Hoffman obtained a temporary restraining order, followed by a preliminary injunction, to prevent Law from removing the septic system. Law counterclaimed for trespass and sought a mandatory injunction ordering removal of encroachments. The circuit court ruled that the encroachments on Lot 4 constituted a trespass but denied Law’s request for an injunction. Law appealed to the South Dakota Supreme Court.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Zinter, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership