Hoffman v. Chapman
Maryland Court of Appeals
34 A.2d 438 (1943)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The Chapmans (plaintiffs), through a real estate agent, sold a part of a parcel of the land to the Hoffmans (defendants). When the Hoffmans paid for the land and took possession, they understood that they were only buying a part of the parcel. However, when the agent drafted the deed, he mistakenly conveyed the entire lot. When the mistake was discovered, the Hoffmans were asked to deed back the portion of the lot that they had not bargained for. They refused to do so, so the Chapmans brought suit. The trial court ruled in favor of the Chapmans and reformed the deed. The Hoffmans appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Delaplaine, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 803,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.