Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Holmes Development, LLC v. Cook

Supreme Court of Utah
48 P.3d 895 (2002)


Facts

Cook Development (defendant) purchased a 323-acre parcel and a 73-acre parcel. Cook and Premier Homes together formed two companies, Lake Creek Farms (Farms) and Lake Creek Associates (Associates) for a development project. Cook conveyed the 323- and 73-acre parcels to Farms and Associates, respectively. When Cook and Premier ended their relationship, the companies agreed to convey both parcels back to Cook. However, the quitclaim deed conveying the larger parcel incorrectly identified Associates as the grantor rather than Farms. In May 1998, Cook sold both parcels via warranty deed to Holmes Development, LLC. In November, Premier, as manager for Farms, sold the 323-acre parcel to Keystone Development, LLC. Keystone sued to quiet title and recorded a lis pendens against the parcel. Although Keystone’s claim was defeated, the lis pendens prevented Holmes from selling any lots within the 323-acre parcel during the prime selling season while continuing to pay the bank that financed Holmes’s purchase of the land. Thus Holmes sued Cook for breach of the covenants of title. The trial court granted Cook summary judgment, holding that any breach was cured when Keystone’s claims were defeated. Holmes appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Russon, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 175,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.