Hook v. Rothstein

316 S.E.2d 690 (1984)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hook v. Rothstein

South Carolina Court of Appeals
316 S.E.2d 690 (1984)

Facts

Jack Summers suffered from persistent stomach pains caused by a mass in his lower intestines. Because of the mass, Summers needed a procedure that required an iodine compound be injected into his veins so his kidneys could be examined via X-ray. Severe reactions caused by the iodine compound could result in death, and patients with a history of asthma or allergies are at an increased risk of reacting negatively to the compound. Dr. Jerry Rothstein (defendant) performed the procedure on Summers. Prior to the procedure, Rothstein asked Summers whether he had any allergies. Although Summers suffered from allergies, he did not tell Rothstein about his allergies. Rothstein did not tell Summers about the possibility of a fatal reaction, because his experience as a doctor taught him that a patient’s fear can play a negative role in reactions to the compound. After the procedure, Summers died from a severe reaction to the compound. Judith Summers Hook (plaintiff) brought suit on Summer’s estate’s behalf against Rothstein for negligence as a result of Rothstein’s failure to inform Summers about the possible risks associated with the procedure. Judgment was entered in Rothstein’s favor, and Hook appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Goolsby, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 805,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership