Hooters of America, Inc. v. Phillips
United States District Court for the District of South Carolina
39 F.Supp.2d 582 (1998)
Annette Phillips (Phillips) (defendant) was an employee of Hooters of Myrtle Beach (HOMB). HOMB is a franchisee of Hooters of America (HOA) (plaintiff). Twice during the course of her employment Phillips signed an agreement to arbitrate. The agreement stated that both Phillips and HOA agreed to arbitrate any dispute. The agreement incorporated arbitration procedures. HOA reserved the right to change the arbitration procedures at any time, and those procedures were very favorable to HOA. While working at HOMB, Phillips was allegedly sexually harassed. Phillips sued HOA, and HOA filed this declaratory action and motion to compel arbitration.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Currie, J)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.