Horne v. Patton
Alabama Supreme Court
287 So. 2d 824 (1973)
- Written by Ann Wooster, JD
Facts
Larry Horne (plaintiff) was a patient of Dr. Patton (defendant). Horne and Patton established a doctor-patient relationship based on payment by Horne for medical services rendered by Patton. Horne expressly instructed Patton not to release any medical information about Horne to his employer. Patton released full medical information to Horne’s employer without authorization. Horne was dismissed from employment as a result of Patton’s disclosure to the employer. Horne filed a complaint in the trial court and asserted that the disclosure by Patton of information acquired in the course of the doctor-patient relationship constituted a breach of the confidential relationship. Patton responded that Horne was not entitled to legal relief even if the alleged facts were true. The trial court sustained Patton’s response. Horne voluntarily abandoned his action in the trial court and filed an action in the state supreme court, assigning as error the trial court’s ruling.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Bloodworth, J.)
Dissent (McCall, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
