Horne v. Patton

287 So. 2d 824 (1973)

Case BriefRelatedOptions
From our private database of 36,900+ case briefs...

Horne v. Patton

Alabama Supreme Court

287 So. 2d 824 (1973)

Facts

Larry Horne (plaintiff) was a patient of Dr. Patton (defendant). Horne and Patton established a doctor-patient relationship based on payment by Horne for medical services rendered by Patton. Horne expressly instructed Patton not to release any medical information about Horne to his employer. Patton released full medical information to Horne’s employer without authorization. Horne was dismissed from employment as a result of Patton’s disclosure to the employer. Horne filed a complaint in the trial court and asserted that the disclosure by Patton of information acquired in the course of the doctor-patient relationship constituted a breach of the confidential relationship. Patton responded that Horne was not entitled to legal relief even if the alleged facts were true. The trial court sustained Patton’s response. Horne voluntarily abandoned his action in the trial court and filed an action in the state supreme court, assigning as error the trial court’s ruling.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Bloodworth, J.)

Dissent (McCall, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 629,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 36,900 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 629,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 36,900 briefs - keyed to 984 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership