Hourihan v. Grossman Holdings Ltd.
Florida District Court of Appeal
396 So. 2d 753 (1981)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
The Hourihans (plaintiffs) contracted with Grossman Holdings Limited (defendant) for the construction of a house. The contract stated that the house would be substantially the same as a model home that Grossman had designed. Construction in this manner would permit the benefits of prevailing winds entering the home and would enable views of a residential area. In actuality, Grossman built a mirror image of the model. The construction of the house in this manner gave the Hourihans a view of a highway and blocked the prevailing winds from entering the house. The Hourihans sued Grossman for breach of contract. The trial court ruled that Grossman breached the contract but declined to award money damages, finding that it would constitute economic waste and that the house’s value, as built by Grossman, had increased significantly over the contract price. The Hourihans appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Nesbitt, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.