Hrvatska Elektroprivreda, DD v. Republic of Slovenia

ICSID Case ARB/05/24 of 6 May 2008 (2008)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Hrvatska Elektroprivreda, DD v. Republic of Slovenia

Panel of Arbitration
ICSID Case ARB/05/24 of 6 May 2008 (2008)

Facts

Hrvatska Elektroprivreda, DD (HEP) (plaintiff) and the Republic of Slovenia (Slovenia) (defendant) entered an arbitration under the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID) Convention. Shortly before an evidentiary hearing related to the arbitration, Slovenia added an English barrister, Mr. Mildon QC, to its legal team. Mildon was a member of the same barrister’s chambers as the presiding arbitrator, and HEP immediately objected to his inclusion as a lawyer for Slovenia. In an application before the presiding arbitrator, HEP sought the disqualification of Mildon, arguing his membership in the same chambers as the same presiding arbitrator compromised the independence of the arbitral tribunal. Slovenia responded that the arbitral tribunal lacked the authority to disqualify counsel and that, as an independent practitioner, Mildon’s participation did not affect the independence or integrity of the tribunal.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Per curiam)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership