From our private database of 35,600+ case briefs...
Hughes v. Emerald Mines Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
450 A.2d 1 (1982)
John and Anna Hughes (the landowners) owned property, on which there were two wells that provided potable water. Emerald Mines Corporation (Emerald) operated on a contiguous piece of property. Emerald dug an airshaft hole near the landowners’ wells, and injected grout into the airshaft. One of the landowners’ wells dried up, and the other became polluted. The landowners (plaintiffs) sued Emerald (defendant), claiming a non-trespassory invasion of their land. The trial jury found in favor of the landowners and awarded them damages of $32,500, based on the loss of the property’s value. Emerald appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Montemuto, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 618,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 618,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 35,600 briefs, keyed to 984 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.