Hughes v. Emerald Mines Corp.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
450 A.2d 1 (1982)
- Written by Mary Pfotenhauer, JD
Facts
John and Anna Hughes (the landowners) owned property, on which there were two wells that provided potable water. Emerald Mines Corporation (Emerald) operated on a contiguous piece of property. Emerald dug an airshaft hole near the landowners’ wells, and injected grout into the airshaft. One of the landowners’ wells dried up, and the other became polluted. The landowners (plaintiffs) sued Emerald (defendant), claiming a non-trespassory invasion of their land. The trial jury found in favor of the landowners and awarded them damages of $32,500, based on the loss of the property’s value. Emerald appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Montemuto, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 967,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,500 briefs, keyed to 1,007 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
- AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New
Understand your casebook readings in seconds
Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.
Get instant access to over 47,500+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,007 law school casebooks.

