Huntington Branch, NAACP v. Town of Huntington
United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
844 F.2d 926 (2d Cir.), review declined in part and judgment aff’d sub nom. Town of Huntington v. Huntington Branch, NAACP, 488 U.S. 15 (1988)
The Town of Huntington (defendant) had a zoning ordinance that restricted multi-family housing projects to a predominantly minority neighborhood (urban renewal area). The Huntington Branch of the NAACP along with Housing Help, Inc. (NAACP) (plaintiffs) sought to build an integrated, subsidized apartment complex in a virtually all-white neighborhood, outside the urban renewal area. NAACP petitioned the town to revise its zoning restriction on this area, but the town refused. NAACP brought a class-action suit claiming a violation of the Fair Housing Act. The district court found in favor of the town. NAACP appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kaufman, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 168,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 13,800 briefs, keyed to 187 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.