Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

Hurley v. Eddingfield

Indiana Supreme Court
59 N.E. 1058 (Ind. 1901)


Facts

Eddingfield (defendant) was a practicing physician in Montgomery County, Indiana. He was relied upon by the decedent of Hurley (plaintiff) as his family physician. Eddingfield held himself out to the public as a general practitioner of medicine, and was licensed in Indiana. One evening Hurley’s decedent became violently ill and sent a messenger to retrieve Eddingfield. The messenger told Eddingfield that Hurley’s decedent was violently ill and was in need of his immediate assistance, and that no other physician could be procured. These circumstances were all true. However, for no reason, Eddingfield refused to come to the aid of Hurley’s decedent. Eddingfield had no other patients to whom he was attending, and there were no obstacles standing in the way of his rendering assistance should he have been so inclined. Hurley’s decedent died shortly after this, through no fault of his own. Hurley sued Eddingfield for $10,000 for wrongfully causing the death of his decedent. The trial court entered judgment for Eddingfield, and Hurley appealed.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Baker, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A "yes" or "no" answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 202,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.