From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
Hurtado v. California
United States Supreme Court
110 U.S. 516 (1884)
- Written by Shelby Crawford, JD
Facts
Hurtado (plaintiff) was charged with and convicted of murder. He was never indicted by a grand jury. Instead, he was charged by information. Hurtado appealed his conviction on grounds that his Fourteenth Amendment right to due process was violated because he was never indicted by a grand jury. Hurtado argued that no process or proceeding other than a grand jury indictment constitutes due process.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Matthews, J.)
Dissent (Harlan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 810,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
