Huy Fong Foods, Inc. v. Underwood Ranches, LP

66 Cal. App. 5th 1112 (2021)

From our private database of 47,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

Huy Fong Foods, Inc. v. Underwood Ranches, LP

California Court of Appeal
66 Cal. App. 5th 1112 (2021)

  • Written by Angela Patrick, JD

Facts

David Tran founded Huy Fong Foods, Inc. (Huy Fong) (plaintiff), which made Sriracha sauce. For 28 years, Huy Fong bought peppers from Underwood Ranches, LP (Underwood) (defendant). During this time, Tran and Underwood’s principal also formed a personal relationship. Although the entities initially used written contracts, they later relied on informal agreements even though the deals involved millions of dollars. Tran pressured Underwood to expand its operations, promising to buy all the peppers it could grow. In response, Underwood invested millions on expansion, including entering expensive long-term leases for additional land. By 2016, Huy Fong’s business provided 80 percent of Underwood’s revenue. However, for years, Huy Fong had been secretly planning to replace Underwood with its own supply company and other growers. Huy Fong also misused confidential information obtained from Underwood to teach other farmers Underwood’s growing methods. Not long after promising to buy Underwood’s 2017 crop, Huy Fong abruptly demanded a price below Underwood’s production cost and refused to provide its usual financing. Underwood was unable to grow its 2017 crop or avoid its leases, losing millions and laying off 40 employees. Underwood later testified that those losses could have been avoided if Huy Fong had given reasonable notice. Huy Fong sued to recover $1.4 million in prepayments it had made for the 2017 crop. Underwood counterclaimed for breach of contract and the tort of fraud. The jury found for Underwood, awarding it $13.32 million in compensatory damages and $10 million in punitive damages. Huy Fong appealed. Among other claims, Huy Fong argued that the punitive-damages award was (1) unavailable in a contract case and (2) excessive.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Gilbert, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 950,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 950,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 47,400 briefs, keyed to 1,004 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
  • AI-generated podcast version of every brief — listen on the go, between classes, or whenever reading isn’t an option. New

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 950,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 47,400 briefs - keyed to 1,004 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Understand your casebook readings in seconds

Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings faster, supplement your notes and outlines, and outshine your peers in class.

Get instant access to over 47,400+ expert-written case briefs in a searchable database keyed to 1,004 law school casebooks.

Case book preview