Logourl black
From our private database of 14,000+ case briefs...

ICC v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers

United States Supreme Court
482 U.S. 270 (1987)


Facts

Union Pacific Railroad Company filed two merger applications with the Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC) (defendant). Several competing railroads, including the Missouri-Kansas-Texas Railroad Company (MKT) and the Denver and Rio Grande Western Railroad Company (DRGW) opposed the mergers. In the alternative MKT and DRGW sought the right to use the track of the consolidated carrier if the ICC approved the merger applications. Both MKT and DRGW proposed to employ their own crews on the new routes. The ICC approved the merger applications and granted MKT and DRGW’s applications for trackage rights. The Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers (BLE) (plaintiff) filed a Petition for Clarification. BLE argued the ICC had no jurisdiction to approve MKT or DRGW’s proposals to provide their own crews because crewing procedures involved labor issues. The ICC denied the petition on May 18, 1983. BLE and the United Transportation Union filed petitions for reconsideration. The ICC denied the petitions on October 25, 1983. BLE thereafter petitioned for judicial review of both the May 18 and October 25 orders. The court of appeals vacated both orders. ICC petitioned for certiorari.

Rule of Law

The rule of law is the black letter law upon which the court rested its decision.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Issue

The issue section includes the dispositive legal issue in the case phrased as a question.

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

Holding and Reasoning (Scalia, J.)

The holding and reasoning section includes:

  • A “yes” or “no” answer to the question framed in the issue section;
  • A summary of the majority or plurality opinion, using the CREAC method; and
  • The procedural disposition (e.g. reversed and remanded, affirmed, etc.).

To access this section, please start your free trial or log in.

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.

Here's why 176,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.