IMS Health GmbH & Co. OHG v. NDC Health GmbH & Co.

Case C-418/01 2004 E.C.D.R. 239 (2004)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

IMS Health GmbH & Co. OHG v. NDC Health GmbH & Co.

European Court of Justice
Case C-418/01 2004 E.C.D.R. 239 (2004)

Facts

IMS Health GmbH & Co. (IMS) provided data to pharmaceutical companies in Germany in a format referred to as a brick structure. IMS distributed these brick structures to pharmaceutical companies free of charge to both pharmacies and doctors. A former manager of IMS left the company in 1998 and began work with Pharma Intranet Information AG (PII), another company that marketed data in brick structures. PII eventually started using brick structures consisting of 1,860 or 3,000 bricks, very similar to the structures used by IMS. PII was later acquired by NDC Health GmbH & Co. (defendant) (NDC). PII sought an injunction in Germany against NDC from using these data structures. After the German courts granted and affirmed the injunction, NDC filed a complaint with the Commission of European Authorities, contending that IMS’s refusal to grant its license to use the brick structure violated Article 82 of the Treaty establishing the European Community (Article 82 EC) because IMS had engaged in abusive content as a dominant party in the market. The German courts stayed their proceedings and referred the legal questions to the European Court of Justice.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 821,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 821,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership