In re .88 Acres of Property
Supreme Court of Vermont
676 A.2d 778 (1996)
In 1807, Benjamin Harrington (defendant) donated a parcel of land to the Town of Shelbourne (Town) (plaintiff) on the condition that the Town build a public meeting house and use it for that purpose. In 1808, the Town built a public meeting house and used it for that purpose until it burned down in 1865. The Town built a new meeting house in 1867 until it also was destroyed by a fire in 1925. By 1927, a school was built on the parcel and a new public meeting house was built on a nearby parcel. The Town sought to quiet title in 1994. The trial court ruled that the Town owned the parcel free and clear of any restrictions because it had acquired the parcel by adverse possession.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Gibson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 707,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 707,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 44,500 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.