In re _______ [The Case of the Proxy Marriage]

2008 Immig. Rptr. LEXIS 12574 (2008)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re _______ [The Case of the Proxy Marriage]

Administrative Appeals Office
2008 Immig. Rptr. LEXIS 12574 (2008)

Facts

The petitioner (plaintiff) was a naturalized citizen of the United States. The petitioner began having telephone conversations with his sister-in-law’s cousin (beneficiary), who was a national and citizen of Cambodia. The petitioner had never met the beneficiary in person. On November 8, 2007, the petitioner filed a Petition for Alien Fiancé(e) on the beneficiary’s behalf. The petitioner stated that it would be difficult to meet the beneficiary in person because of a Cambodian cultural and social practice in which parents did not let their daughters go anywhere with their fiancés until after the two were married. The petitioner also admitted that he would make a trip to Cambodia if he received approval of his petition. The petition was denied because the petitioner failed to establish that he met the beneficiary within the required statutory period of two years immediately preceding the filing of the petition. The petitioner appealed the denial of his petition.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership