In re Akivis
New York Supreme Court
128 Misc. 2d 965, 492 N.Y.S.2d 316 (1985)
Sixty Four Reade Corp. (Sixty Four Reade) sold its New York City property to Akivis (plaintiff). As part of the sale process, Sixty Four Reade’s attorney, David Brecher (defendant), received $5,000 in funds from Akivis to hold as escrow agent. After the sale, Sixty Four Reade failed to remove its possessions within 60 days and leave the property in broom-clean condition, as required by the real estate contract. Despite this noncompliance with the contract terms, Brecher released the $5,000 to Sixty Four Reade. Akivis brought an Article 78 proceeding against Brecher, alleging Brecher breached his duties as escrow agent and seeking damages for his failure to hand over the property in broom-clean condition.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Kramer, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.