In re Becton, Dickinson and Company
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
675 F.3d 1368 (2012)
- Written by Carolyn Strutton, JD
Facts
Becton, Dickinson and Company (Becton) (plaintiff) applied to register its design for a closure cap for blood-collection tubes as a trademark. The design included both functional and nonfunctional features. The examining attorney refused the registration on the grounds that the overall design was functional. Becton appealed to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (the board), and the board upheld the examiner’s refusal. Becton appealed, alleging that the design as a whole was nonfunctional.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Clevenger, J.)
Dissent (Linn, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 812,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.