In re Biomet Products Liability Litigation
United States District Court for the Northern District of Indiana
2013 WL 6405156 (2013)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
Hundreds of consumers formed a plaintiffs’ steering committee (committee) (plaintiff) to represent them in a federal products-liability action against Biomet (defendant), the manufacturer of artificial-hip implants that the consumers alleged were defective. Biomet used a seed set, i.e., a sample from a larger group, of search terms to create the predictive-coding algorithms with which Biomet planned to identify relevant and discoverable electronically stored information. The committee asked Biomet to disclose how it put its seed set together. This information would enable the committee to identify and help correct any gaps in Biomet’s search terms. Biomet answered that nothing in the law required disclosure. The committee cited a Sedona Conference report in support of its motion to compel disclosure of the seed-set information.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Miller, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.