In re Boeing Co., Lockheed Martin Corp. & United Launch Alliance

File No. 051-0165 (FTC, October 12, 2006)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Boeing Co., Lockheed Martin Corp. & United Launch Alliance

Federal Trade Commission
File No. 051-0165 (FTC, October 12, 2006)

Facts

Boeing Company and Lockheed Martin Corporation (Lockheed) were the only two American companies that manufactured expendable launch vehicles (ELVs), a form of rocket, that were used to launch medium to heavy satellites and other space vehicles. Boing and Lockheed sold the ELVs and associated launch services to the Department of Defense (DoD) and other government customers. In 2005, Boeing and Lockheed agreed to form a joint venture known as United Launch Alliance (ULA) to consolidate their development and manufacturing of ELVs. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) filed a complaint against Boeing and Lockheed, arguing that the ULA joint venture would violate the Clayton Act and the FTC Act by substantially reducing competition in the relevant markets for government medium-to-heavy launch services and government space vehicles. Boeing, Lockheed, and the FTC executed a proposed consent decree, and the FTC provided an analysis of the proposed decree to aid in the public-comment process taking place before the decree’s finalization. [Editor’s Note: The casebook excerpt is from the FTC’s analysis of the proposed consent decree, not from a judicial decision.]

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning ()

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership