In re California Innovations, Inc.

329 F.3d 1334 (2003)

Study Aids
Case Briefs Overview
Casebooks
Case Briefs
I
From our private database of 46,200+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re California Innovations, Inc.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
329 F.3d 1334 (2003)

Play video

Facts

California Innovations, Inc. (California Innovations) (plaintiff), a Canadian corporation, filed an intent-to-use trademark application in March 1995 for a composite mark featuring the company name. The California Innovations mark was to be used in association with various auto accessories and insulated bags for food and beverages. In July 1999, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) refused to register the California Innovations mark after determining that it was primarily geographically deceptively mis-descriptive. California Innovations appealed the decision of the PTO to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB). In February 2002, the TTAB upheld the PTO decision that the California Innovations mark was geographically deceptively mis-descriptive. California Innovations appealed the decision only as applied to use of the mark in association with insulated wraps and bags for food and beverages.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Rader, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 789,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

    Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

    Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee

Here's why 789,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,200 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 789,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,200 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership

Casebooks

Intellectual Property
Trademark

Key Terms