In re Carlisle Etcetera LLC
Delaware Court of Chancery
114 A.3d 592 (2015)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Well Union Capital Limited (WU Parent) (plaintiff) and Tom James Company (James) (defendant) formed Carlisle Etcetera LLC. The parties signed an initial LLC agreement with plans to sign a more comprehensive document at a later date. WU Parent transferred its interest to Well Union U.S. Holdings, Inc. (WU Sub) (plaintiff). A draft of the more comprehensive LLC agreement contemplated transferring membership when an interest was transferred, but the draft was never signed. Rather, Carlisle had only its initial LLC agreement. Under the agreement, Carlisle had four board members, two appointed by WU Parent and two appointed by James. The LLC agreement stated that the board was the LLC’s sole manager. An executive for James served as Carlisle’s CEO. The relationships within Carlisle deteriorated. The board split 2-2 on any important decision that came before it. WU Sub filed a petition for judicial dissolution of Carlisle. James, whose executive was effectively operating Carlisle without any oversight, filed a motion to dismiss the petition, arguing that WU Sub did not have standing.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Laster, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 802,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.