In re Carlisle Etcetera LLC
Delaware Court of Chancery
114 A.3d 592 (2015)
Well Union Capital Limited (WU Parent) (plaintiff) and Tom James Company (James) (defendant) formed Carlisle Etcetera LLC. The parties signed an initial LLC agreement with plans to sign a more comprehensive document at a later date. WU Parent transferred its interest to Well Union U.S. Holdings, Inc. (WU Sub) (plaintiff). A draft of the more comprehensive LLC agreement contemplated transferring membership when an interest was transferred, but the draft was never signed. Rather, Carlisle had only its initial LLC agreement. Under the agreement, Carlisle had four board members, two appointed by WU Parent and two appointed by James. The LLC agreement stated that the board was the LLC’s sole manager. An executive for James served as Carlisle’s CEO. The relationships within Carlisle deteriorated. The board split 2-2 on any important decision that came before it. WU Sub filed a petition for judicial dissolution of Carlisle. James, whose executive was effectively operating Carlisle without any oversight, filed a motion to dismiss the petition, arguing that WU Sub did not have standing.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Laster, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 724,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 724,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 45,600 briefs, keyed to 983 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.