In re Carpenter

378 B.R. 274 (2007)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Carpenter

United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Idaho
378 B.R. 274 (2007)

  • Written by Jody Stuart, JD

Facts

On December 11, 2005, Tracy Carpenter (plaintiff) purchased a truck from Jana Lang (defendant). On the same day, Carpenter and Lang executed a purchase agreement at Lang’s residence and agreed that Lang would retain a security interest in the truck to secure Carpenter’s future payment of the purchase price. The agreement provided that Carpenter would take delivery of the truck on the execution date, December 11. Because Carpenter could not yet afford insurance for the truck, Carpenter decided not to take delivery of the truck at that time and left it in Lang’s garage. Lang agreed to this arrangement. On December 19, Carpenter obtained insurance for the truck. Due to complications, Carpenter did not retrieve the truck until January 4, 2006. On January 31, Lang’s security interest was perfected by notation of her lien on the truck’s certificate of title. On July 27, Carpenter filed for bankruptcy. Sam Hopkins, the bankruptcy trustee, argued that he could avoid Carpenter’s transfer of the security interest to Lang. Carpenter and Lang testified that Carpenter could have picked up the truck any time starting from December 11.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Pappas, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 820,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 820,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership