In re Checking Account Overdraft Litigation
United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
694 F.Supp.2d 1302 (2010)
- Written by Craig Conway, LLM
Facts
A number of individuals in various states (Plaintiffs) filed suit against various banks (Defendants) in federal court alleging that the banks had engaged in a widespread illegal practice of charging overdraft fees connected to debit card transactions. The Plaintiffs claim that the Defendants entered debit charges from the “largest to the smallest” amounts thereby maximizing their overdraft fee revenue. The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferred all of the related actions to the district court for pre-trial proceedings. The Panel, known informally as the MDL Panel, surveys civil actions with a common complaint pending in different federal districts and transfers them all to one district court for consolidated or coordinated proceedings. The Plaintiffs asserted various theories ranging from breach of contract and breach of a covenant of good faith and fair dealing to unconscionability, conversion, unjust enrichment, and violation of the consumer protection statutes of various states. Defendants filed an omnibus motion to dismiss the complaints. The district court ruled on the Defendants’ motion.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (King, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.