In re Clerici
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
481 F.3d 1324 (2007)
NoName Corporation (NoName) (defendant) won a judgment against Patricio Clerici (plaintiff) in a Panamanian court. NoName had a right to financial information from Clerici under Panamanian law to assist in the collection of the judgment. Clerici resided in Florida. The Panamanian court issued a request for judicial assistance to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, under 28 U.S.C. § 1782, to obtain information from Clerici. The district court granted the request, and Clerici appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Clerici argued that the district court erred, because NoName was not using the request to obtain evidence as required by § 1782, but rather was trying to enforce a judgment, and that the request for information was burdensome.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Hull, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 174,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,000 briefs, keyed to 188 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.