In re Cordua Restaurants, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
823 F.3d 594 (2016)
- Written by Sean Carroll, JD
Facts
Cordua Restaurants, Inc. (Cordua) (plaintiff), owned a chain of restaurants called Churrascos. Cordua filed a trademark application, seeking to register a stylized form of the word “CHURRASCOS.” The trademark examiner for the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) (defendant) rejected the application on the ground that the mark was generic to Cordua’s services. Cordua acknowledged that the word churrasco meant barbecue in Portuguese. The PTO’s Trademark Trial and Appeal Board affirmed the examiner’s decision. Cordua appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Dyk, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 805,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.