From our private database of 14,100+ case briefs...
In re Craddock-Terry Shoe Corporation
United State Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Virginia
98 B.R. 250 (1988)
Craddock-Terry Shoe Corporation (Craddock-Terry) obtained a $9 million loan from Lincoln National Life Insurance Company (Lincoln) (plaintiff) and Westinghouse Credit Corporation (Westinghouse) (plaintiff). The loan was secured by various assets as collateral, including the customer mailing list of Hill Brothers, a division of Craddock-Terry. When Craddock-Terry eventually filed for bankruptcy, Craddock-Terry’s debt to Lincoln and Westinghouse totaled nearly $9.6 million. Lincoln and Westinghouse filed a motion to either (1) lift the automatic stay issued under § 362(a) of the United States Bankruptcy Code (Code) or (2) ensure that Craddock-Terry provided Lincoln and Westinghouse with sufficient protection for the collateral, which they worried was declining in value. At a hearing on the motion, the evidence established that Hill Brothers had suffered cash-flow issues since the time of the filing, affecting the value of the mailing list. Lincoln and Westinghouse presented expert testimony indicating that the mailing list’s value had declined from $8.7 million at the time of the petition to $5.7 million at the time of the hearing. In contrast, Craddock-Terry offered expert testimony indicating a devaluation from only $700,000 to $330,000 during this period of time. This valuation was based on various factors, including the fact that a company’s mailing list would hold much more value to the company itself than to a third party. At the hearing, the evidence also established that Craddock-Terry had been selling off assets to use the proceeds to reorganize Hill Brothers.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Anderson, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 218,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.