In re Del-Maur Farms, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Nebraska
2011 WL 2847709, 75 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d 63 (2011)
- Written by Abby Roughton, JD
Facts
In 2007, Del-Maur Farms, Inc. (Del-Maur) (debtor) entered into an agreement with CoBank Farm Credit Leasing Services Corporation (CoBank) (creditor). The agreement took the form of a lease and provided that Del-Maur would make 60 monthly installment payments of $1,206.41 for a Grow Master pig-sorting system. The agreement provided that Del-Maur could purchase the Grow Master at the end of 60 months for $6,584.40, which was 10 percent of the Grow Master’s original cost. The agreement provided that if Del-Maur did not exercise its purchase option, the lease would automatically renew for 12 months with a projected monthly renewal rent of $579.25. The agreement stated that upon expiration of that renewal term, Del-Maur could either return the Grow Master or purchase the Grow Master for an amount equal to its then-fair market value. The agreement provided that Del-Maur’s obligation to pay rent and perform its other duties under the agreement was irrevocable. Del-Maur subsequently filed for bankruptcy. CoBank filed a claim in the bankruptcy proceeding and sought preferential treatment available to lessors under 11 U.S.C. § 365. Del-Maur objected, asserting that the agreement regarding the Grow Master was not actually a lease and was instead a purchase agreement and security interest. In analyzing Del-Maur’s objection, the court considered whether the agreement should be a security agreement or a lease under Nebraska’s statutory Uniform Commercial Code (UCC).
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Mahoney, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 806,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.