United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
287 B.R. 632 (2003)
Susan Lee Denochick (debtor) took out a debt-consolidation loan with NBOC. Susan’s sister, Sandra Krasinski (creditor), agreed to guarantee the loan. Denochick later filed for bankruptcy. Denochick had made payments on the loan to NBOC in the year prior to filing. Although the payments went to NBOC, Krasinski benefited from the payments indirectly because the payments reduced her exposure as guarantor of the loan. The bankruptcy trustee petitioned the bankruptcy court to avoid the payments to NBOC as preferential transfers and recover the payments from Krasinski. The bankruptcy court held that Krasinski was a creditor, that the transfer did not fall under any exceptions for preferential transfers, and that the trustee could recover the amount of the transfer from Krasinski. Krasinski appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Cindrich, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 219,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.