United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas
2012 WL 6694074 (2012)
Diabetes America, Inc. (Diabetes) (debtor) was incorporated in Delaware but located in Texas. Diabetes filed for reorganization under chapter 11 of the bankruptcy code. Prior to the bankruptcy petition, Frank Basile (creditor) had lent Diabetes $150,000 and held a security interest in Diabetes’s assets. Basile filed a financing statement to perfect the security interest in Texas. However, Basile did not file a financing statement in Delaware. When Diabetes filed for bankruptcy, Basile filed a secured proof of claim with the bankruptcy court. The bankruptcy trustee moved for summary judgment as to Basile’s claim, arguing that Delaware commercial law applied to the perfection of security interests in Diabetes’s assets, and that Basile’s security interest was unperfected in Delaware.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Isgur, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.