In re Domestic Air Transportation Antitrust Litigation

137 F.R.D. 677 (1991)

From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Domestic Air Transportation Antitrust Litigation

United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
137 F.R.D. 677 (1991)

Facts

The plaintiffs sought class-action certification for an estimated class of 12.5 million purchasers against multiple defendants in an antitrust action, alleging a conspiracy not to engage in price competition for airline tickets for routes to and from a specific hub airport. The defendants contested class certification on two grounds: (1) that the enormous class size made the class action unmanageable; and (2) that because many class members were not readily identifiable, the plaintiffs could not give the required individual-directed notice under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23(c)(2). At the court’s request, the plaintiffs submitted a proposed plan for how to administer the class members’ claims that included utilizing accounting firms that specialized in class actions and computers and scanners to index and control the vast quantities of data.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Shoob, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 824,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 989 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 824,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,400 briefs - keyed to 989 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership