From our private database of 46,400+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.
In re Dow Chemical Co. Derivative Litigation
Delaware Court of Chancery
2010 Del. Ch. LEXIS 2 (2010)
- Written by Rich Walter, JD
Facts
The directors (defendants) of Dow Chemical Company (Dow) concluded a merger agreement that unconditionally obligated Dow to purchase the Rohm & Haas Company (R&H). Prior to closing, Dow experienced unexpected financial setbacks that resulted in Dow’s losing money on the R&H merger. Dow’s shareholders sued the directors in the Delaware Court of Chancery, alleging various breaches of the directors’ fiduciary duties. Dow’s directors moved to dismiss the case on the grounds that the shareholders failed to demand that Dow assert its own direct rights against the directors.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Chandler, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 830,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
