In re Estate of Bancker

232 So. 2d 431 (1970)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re Estate of Bancker

Florida District Court of Appeal
232 So. 2d 431 (1970)

  • Written by Liz Nakamura, JD

Facts

Adrian Bancker, decedent, executed his first will in 1962, which was subsequently amended by a 1965 codicil. In 1966, Adrian executed a new will, but the only material change between the 1966 will and the 1962 will, as amended by the 1965 codicil, was the appointment of a different alternative executor. When Adrian then sought to revoke the 1966 will, the lawyer who had drafted the 1962 will for Adrian informed him that he could revoke the 1966 will by destroying it. Adrian then directed his wife, Isabelle Bancker (plaintiff), to destroy the will. While Adrian remained in bed, Isabelle went into the next room, removed the will from the safe, and destroyed it. Adrian did not see Isabelle destroy the will, but he nodded in approval when Isabelle informed him that the will had been destroyed. After Adrian died, Isabelle submitted the 1962 will and 1965 codicil to probate. When Adrian’s three natural children (defendants) challenged the validity of the 1962 will, Isabelle sought instead to reestablish and probate the 1966 will. The trial court ruled that the 1962 will was invalid, that the 1966 will was not properly reestablished, and that Adrian’s estate must therefore pass via intestacy. Isabelle appealed.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Walden, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership