In re Estate of Sidney Altman
California Superior Court
Case. No. BP039093 (2000)
- Written by Kyli Cotten, JD
Facts
Sidney Israel Altman left a holographic will at the time of his death. The will attempted to provide care for Altman’s dog, Samantha, by bequeathing Altman’s home and $350,000 to the animal’s care. Altman appointed his close friend, Marie Dana (plaintiff), to care for Samantha in exchange for living in the house and a $60,000 tax-free salary. Altman also expressed the desire to continue to employ his housekeeper, Rosa Parades, for the house’s upkeep. The executor of Altman’s will, Clive Diamond, was to oversee Dana’s care of Samantha and remove the dog if she was not being sufficiently looked after. Upon Samantha’s death, the house was to be sold and the funds were distributed to animal charities, PETA and Last Chance for Animals. Dana alleged that Altman had promised to take care of her for the remainder of her life prior to his death. Thus, Dana challenged the will and sought the sum of $2.7 million. PETA and Last Chance for Animals filed objections and petitioned for the court to make determinations as to distributions.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning ()
What to do next…
Here's why 811,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.
