Superior Court of Pennsylvania
694 A.2d 1099 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1997)
Alfred Smith decided to commit suicide. On May 6, 1994, he mailed checks and suicide notes to his sister and his niece (defendants). The next day, he delivered two more checks and suicide notes to his girlfriend and her sister (also defendants) before returning home and killing himself. The four women each cashed their checks. Smith’s wife Jean (plaintiff) became the administratrix of his estate. She asked for the funds from the checks to be returned to the estate. When the four women refused, Jean filed suit to compel the return of the funds. The trial court ruled against her, holding that Smith had made valid gifts causa mortis. She then appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (Del Sole, J.)
Dissent (Cirillo, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 97,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Vanderbilt, Berkeley, and the University of Illinois—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students. Read our student testimonials.
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students. Read more about Quimbee.
Here's why 221,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 14,100 briefs, keyed to 189 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.