In Re Gold & Honey, Ltd.

410 B.R. 357 (2009)

From our private database of 46,500+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In Re Gold & Honey, Ltd.

United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of New York
410 B.R. 357 (2009)

  • Written by Rose VanHofwegen, JD

Facts

In 1993, New York-based jewelry maker Almond Jewelry (debtor) decided to move a manufacturing facility from New York to Israel. The Israeli government provided $35 million in grants and loans to Gold & Honey Ltd. (GH Ltd.) (debtor), an Israeli corporation Almond partially owned, because Israel did not give foreign partnerships government incentives. GH Ltd. pledged assets as collateral. In 1996, the Israeli government assigned the interest to Gold & Honey LP (GH LP) (debtor), a New York partnership with both Almond and GH Ltd. as general partners, and GH LP pledged collateral. All three debtors maintained primary bank accounts at the First National Bank of Israel (FIBI), which extended GH Ltd. a $9 million working line of credit guaranteed by GH LP. When FIBI increased the line of credit to $12 million in 2003, then to $16 million in March 2008, GH LP pledged additional collateral. In July 2008, FIBI seized substantially all of GH Ltd. and GH LP’s assets and accounts and commenced Israeli receivership proceedings. Shortly thereafter, the debtors filed under Chapter 11 in New York. Despite the automatic stay, FIBI continued its receivership application. The debtors requested an order determining that the stay applied to their property wherever located, particularly in the Israeli receivership proceeding. The bankruptcy court ordered that the stay be applied to the debtors’ property “wherever located and by whomever held,” but FIBI continued prosecuting the receivership application. The Israeli court declined to give effect to the automatic stay or the bankruptcy court’s order and appointed receivers for GH Ltd. and GH LP. In January 2009, FIBI moved for recognition of the Israeli receivership proceedings as foreign main proceedings under Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Trust, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 832,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,500 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 832,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,500 briefs - keyed to 994 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership