In re: Grand Jury Investigation [Rowland]

399 F.3d 527 (2005)

From our private database of 46,300+ case briefs, written and edited by humans—never with AI.

In re: Grand Jury Investigation [Rowland]

United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
399 F.3d 527 (2005)

  • Written by Peggy Chen, JD

Facts

A federal grand jury investigating possible criminal wrongdoing by Connecticut public officials subpoenaed Anne C. George, the former chief legal counsel to the Office of the Governor. The investigation concerned whether the governor and other public officials had accepted gifts from individuals in return for the grant of certain state contracts. When Goerge appeared before the grand jury, she testified that she had had numerous conversations with the governor and other officials on the acceptance of gifts and related ethics laws. She refused to testify as to the content of these conversations because they were protected by the attorney-client privilege. The district court then entered an order compelling George to testify, on the ground that the governmental attorney-client privilege was not as strong as the private attorney-client privilege, and must give way when it serves the public interest, such as during a grand jury investigation. The Office of the Governor and Rowland, as interested parties, appealed the district court’s decision.

Rule of Law

Issue

Holding and Reasoning (Walker, J.)

What to do next…

  1. Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.

    You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 815,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.

  2. Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.

    Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.

Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:

  • Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
  • The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
  • Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
  • Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership
Here's why 815,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
  • Reliable - written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students
  • The right length and amount of information - includes the facts, issue, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents
  • Access in your class - works on your mobile and tablet
  • 46,300 briefs - keyed to 988 casebooks
  • Uniform format for every case brief
  • Written in plain English - not in legalese and not just repeating the court's language
  • Massive library of related video lessons - and practice questions
  • Top-notch customer support

Access this case brief for FREE

With a 7-day free trial membership