In re Grand Jury Subpoenas (Andersen)
United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
906 F.2d 1485 (10th Cir. 1990)
Four defendants were charged with various drug-related crimes. The grand jury issued subpoenas to the defendants’ attorneys, seeking the source of the defendants’ payment of their legal fees. The grand jury suspected that the defendants were part of a larger drug ring and sought to make the connection through the source of the defendants’ legal payments. The defendants’ attorneys filed motions to quash the subpoenas. The motions were denied. The trial court called the attorneys to testify before the grand jury. However, the attorneys refused to testify or provide the information requested in the subpoenas, citing attorney-client privilege. The trial court held the attorneys in contempt. The attorneys appealed.
Rule of Law
Holding and Reasoning (McKay, J.)
What to do next…
Unlock this case brief with a free (no-commitment) trial membership of Quimbee.
You’ll be in good company: Quimbee is one of the most widely used and trusted sites for law students, serving more than 687,000 law students since 2011. Some law schools—such as Yale, Berkeley, and Northwestern—even subscribe directly to Quimbee for all their law students.Unlock this case briefRead our student testimonials
Learn more about Quimbee’s unique (and proven) approach to achieving great grades at law school.
Quimbee is a company hell-bent on one thing: helping you get an “A” in every course you take in law school, so you can graduate at the top of your class and get a high-paying law job. We’re not just a study aid for law students; we’re the study aid for law students.Learn about our approachRead more about Quimbee
Here's why 687,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 43,000 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.