In re Grand Jury Subpoenas, Served on White & Case LLP, Lieff, Cabraser, Heinemann, Bernstein LLP, K&L Gates LLP, and Nossaman LLP
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
627 F.3d 1143 (2010)
- Written by Sharon Feldman, JD
Facts
The United States was conducting an antitrust investigation. Shortly after the investigation became public, private parties filed civil suits against the companies under investigation (the companies). As part of civil discovery, the companies produced documents that originated outside the United States. The documents were produced pursuant to a civil protective order. The United States served grand jury subpoenas on the law firms representing the companies, seeking nonprivileged material to aid the grand jury in investigating the law firms’ clients. The law firms moved to quash the subpoenas pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 17(c)(2), which permits the district court to quash a subpoena if compliance would be unreasonable or oppressive. The district court could not find any authority governing the matter and quashed the subpoenas to permit the United States, on appeal, to raise issues about the relationship between the grand jury and civil discovery from foreign companies that have not been indicted. The United States appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Noonan, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 829,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,400 briefs, keyed to 994 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.