In re Graupner
United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
537 F.3d 1295 (2008)
- Written by Heather Whittemore, JD
Facts
Stephen Michael Graupner (debtor) purchased a pickup truck from a dealer in Georgia. During the transaction, Graupner traded in another vehicle with a negative equity—the amount that Graupner owed for the vehicle that exceeded the vehicle’s value—of over $6,000. The total amount Graupner financed, including the negative equity, was approximately $36,000. The dealer assigned the loan to Nuvell Credit Corporation (Nuvell) (creditor), which retained a security interest in the truck. Graupner filed for Chapter 13 bankruptcy 301 days after buying the truck. At that time, the truck’s value was approximately $23,000 and Graupner owed almost $34,000 on the loan. Graupner proposed to bifurcate Nuvell’s claim. Nuvell objected, arguing that the hanging paragraph of 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(9) prohibited Graupner from bifurcating its claim. Section 1325(a)(9) prohibited bifurcation of a claim if the secured creditor had a purchase-money security interest in a vehicle purchased for the debtor’s personal use within 910 days of the debtor’s filing for bankruptcy. Graupner argued that Nuvell did not have a purchase-money security interest in the truck, because the loan that the truck secured included the negative equity in Graupner’s trade-in vehicle. The bankruptcy court held that Nuvell had a purchase-money security interest in the truck because the negative equity in the trade-in vehicle was part of the truck’s purchase price. The district court affirmed. Graupner appealed.
Rule of Law
Issue
Holding and Reasoning (Vinson, J.)
What to do next…
Here's why 804,000 law students have relied on our case briefs:
- Written by law professors and practitioners, not other law students. 46,300 briefs, keyed to 988 casebooks. Top-notch customer support.
- The right amount of information, includes the facts, issues, rule of law, holding and reasoning, and any concurrences and dissents.
- Access in your classes, works on your mobile and tablet. Massive library of related video lessons and high quality multiple-choice questions.
- Easy to use, uniform format for every case brief. Written in plain English, not in legalese. Our briefs summarize and simplify; they don’t just repeat the court’s language.